Talk:Onkyo

Well, the research and history section is not exactly objective...

No, probably comes from an advertising brochure...

May 2016 again somewhat objectified

Let's see if the Onkyo freaks can stand this now no longer 1:1 from the page gardi.de page.

Kind regards, Analoghatwas

Dear Charly, today (June 8, 2018) you have added here again promotional textual passages. Here it concerns however a wiki, compare that calmly times with the Wikipedia. Some of it I've clarified, some passages would have to be worded more factually again. Since I would like no Edit was, now here this reference. It would be best if you could adjust the flowery passages yourself.

" Hardly any other manufacturer in the HiFi industry can show a development like Onkyo. " Could you please justify this factually? I would delete this sentence, because in my opinion the deeper content is missing.

Or " In addition to new innovative products: what are they?

"exclusive technical concepts:" Are the concepts mentioned really 'exclusive'? Does no competitor have anything comparable and is thus also far behind Onkyo, especially in terms of sound quality?

I would also like to question the section on contemporary history: does it really matter in which year which national company was founded? Surely that can be presented in a more compact way . . .

History section in a nutshell: regain its reputation as a .... regain, how does that work?, or some extremely competent audio components: when is an audio component extremely competent??

Very much hope for your understanding or info here on the discussion page. MfG--Analoghatwas (Discussion) 20:00, 8 Jun 2018 (CEST)