Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"

m
(Ergänzende Überlegungen.)
 
(23 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
: wäre es nicht von vorteil, wenn man wie bei wikipedia sogenannte Bausteine einfügen?? so wäre es möglich, dass man bestimmten seiten in kategorien wie 'Nicht_Vorlagen_Konform' o.ä. hinzufügen kann. Der Vorteil ist, dass man mal alle Seiten so markieren kann, und wenn mehr zeit vorhanden ist, kann man diese dann auch überarbeiten. würde natürlich dabei helfen!! --[[Benutzer:Pfuender|Pfuender]] 21:33, 20. Jul 2007 (CEST)
+
: would it not be advantageous to insert so-called building blocks like wikipedia?? so it would be possible that you can add certain pages in categories such as 'Non_templates_compliant' or similar. The advantage is that you can mark times all pages so, and when more time is available, you can then revise them. would help of course!!! --[[User:Pfuender|Pfuender]] 21:33, 20 Jul 2007 (CEST)
:: Die Idee finde ich sehr gut! Hatte auch schonmal über etwas ähnliches nachgedacht, aber das dann irgendwie nicht weiterverfolgt. Eine Einteilung ahnlich wie auf deiner Benutzerseite (nicht vorlagenkonforme, kurze Artikel/Löschkandidaten) erscheint mir für den Anfang sinnvoll --[[Benutzer:Gero|Gero]] 17:56, 22. Jul 2007 (CEST)
+
:: I find the idea very good! I had thought about something similar before, but somehow didn't follow it up. A classification similar to the one on your user page (non-template compliant, short articles/deletion candidates) seems to make sense to me for a start --[[User:Gero|Gero]] 17:56, 22 Jul 2007 (CEST)
::: Ok, Ich habe die Verbesserungsvorschläge mal auf eine separate Seite verschoben ([[Benutzer:Pfuender/Todo]]) Du kannst es ja dahin verschieben wo du möchtest. Kannst die Seite natürlich auch anpassen wenn sie dir optisch nicht passt. --[[Benutzer:Pfuender|Pfuender]] 19:34, 22. Jul 2007 (CEST)
+
::: Ok, I moved the suggestions to a separate page ([[User:Pfuender/Todo]]) You can move it where you want. Of course you can also adjust the page if it doesn't suit you optically. --[[User:Pfuender|Pfuender]] 19:34, 22 Jul 2007 (CEST)
:: So, ich habe mal 2 enstprechende Textbausteine erstellt. Auf der [[HifiWiki:Hilfe|Hilfe-Seite]] gibt's mehr Infos. --[[Benutzer:Gero|Gero]] 15:38, 7. Aug 2007 (CEST)
+
:: So, I have created 2 corresponding text modules. See the [[HifiWiki:Help|Help page]] for more info. --[[User:Gero|Gero]] 15:38, 7 Aug 2007 (CEST)
::: Genial! Kannst ja dann bei gelegenheit meine Seite ([[Benutzer:Pfuender/Todo]]) entfernen. GRZ --[[Benutzer:Pfuender|Pfuender]] 20:43, 7. Aug 2007 (CEST)
+
::: Ingenious! You can remove my page ([[User:Pfuender/Todo]]) at the next opportunity. GRZ --[[User:Pfuender|Pfuender]] 20:43, 7 Aug 2007 (CEST)
 +
: How about information about specific series or products: "Series X devices were produced from 1978-1984 and were entry-level devices. In this, device Y had the additional equipment A compared to device Z."
 +
 
 +
How about the additional addition of all the templates about it being an analog or digital device? Especially with the older devices without pictures this would be of highest interest. Greeting Oli 26.08.09
 +
 
 +
== Missing: Category portable devices or portable radio? ==
 +
 
 +
 
 +
For the new entry of a portable radio [[Neckermann FM-AM 10Transistor Art.-Nr.822-96]] a category is missing, or does this fall under Portable?<br />
 +
Or "exotics" that don't exist yet either? Or exotics just run like that?
 +
 
 +
Since I can't write anything in the "desired categories", question placed here on the main page.
 +
 
 +
Best regards, Analoghatwas

Latest revision as of 14:23, 5 March 2017

would it not be advantageous to insert so-called building blocks like wikipedia?? so it would be possible that you can add certain pages in categories such as 'Non_templates_compliant' or similar. The advantage is that you can mark times all pages so, and when more time is available, you can then revise them. would help of course!!! --Pfuender 21:33, 20 Jul 2007 (CEST)
I find the idea very good! I had thought about something similar before, but somehow didn't follow it up. A classification similar to the one on your user page (non-template compliant, short articles/deletion candidates) seems to make sense to me for a start --Gero 17:56, 22 Jul 2007 (CEST)
Ok, I moved the suggestions to a separate page (User:Pfuender/Todo) You can move it where you want. Of course you can also adjust the page if it doesn't suit you optically. --Pfuender 19:34, 22 Jul 2007 (CEST)
So, I have created 2 corresponding text modules. See the Help page for more info. --Gero 15:38, 7 Aug 2007 (CEST)
Ingenious! You can remove my page (User:Pfuender/Todo) at the next opportunity. GRZ --Pfuender 20:43, 7 Aug 2007 (CEST)
How about information about specific series or products: "Series X devices were produced from 1978-1984 and were entry-level devices. In this, device Y had the additional equipment A compared to device Z."

How about the additional addition of all the templates about it being an analog or digital device? Especially with the older devices without pictures this would be of highest interest. Greeting Oli 26.08.09

Missing: Category portable devices or portable radio?

For the new entry of a portable radio Neckermann FM-AM 10Transistor Art.-Nr.822-96 a category is missing, or does this fall under Portable?
Or "exotics" that don't exist yet either? Or exotics just run like that?

Since I can't write anything in the "desired categories", question placed here on the main page.

Best regards, Analoghatwas