Difference between revisions of "Talk:Onkyo"
Analoghatwas (talk | contribs) m (→Mai 2016 nochmal etwas versachlicht: Frage ergänzt.) |
Analoghatwas (talk | contribs) m (→Mai 2016 nochmal etwas versachlicht) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | Well, the research and history section is not exactly objective... | |
| − | + | No, probably comes from an advertising brochure... | |
| − | == | + | == May 2016 again somewhat objectified == |
| − | + | Let's see if the Onkyo freaks can stand this now no longer 1:1 from the page gardi.de page. | |
| − | + | Kind regards, Analoghatwas | |
| − | : | + | : Dear Charly, today (June 8, 2018) you have added here again promotional textual passages. Here it concerns however a wiki, compare that calmly times with the Wikipedia. Some of it I've clarified, some passages would have to be worded more factually again. Since I would like no Edit was, now here this reference. It would be best if you could adjust the flowery passages yourself. |
| − | :" '' | + | :" ''Hardly any other manufacturer in the HiFi industry can show a development like Onkyo. ''" Could you please justify this factually? I would delete this sentence, because in my opinion the deeper content is missing. |
| − | + | Or " ''In addition to new innovative products'': what are they? | |
| − | : "'' | + | : "''exclusive technical concepts'':" Are the concepts mentioned really 'exclusive'? Does no competitor have anything comparable and is thus also far behind Onkyo, especially in terms of sound quality? |
| − | : | + | I would also like to question the section on contemporary history: does it really matter in which year which national company was founded? Surely that can be presented in a more compact way . . . |
| − | : | + | : History section in a nutshell: ''regain its reputation as a .... regain'', how does that work?, or some ''extremely competent audio components'': when is an audio component ''extremely competent''?? |
| − | : | + | : Very much hope for your understanding or info here on the discussion page. MfG--[[User:Analoghatwas|Analoghatwas]] ([[User Discussion:Analoghatwas|Discussion]]) 20:00, 8 Jun 2018 (CEST) |
Latest revision as of 14:53, 8 June 2018
Well, the research and history section is not exactly objective...
No, probably comes from an advertising brochure...
May 2016 again somewhat objectified[edit]
Let's see if the Onkyo freaks can stand this now no longer 1:1 from the page gardi.de page.
Kind regards, Analoghatwas
- Dear Charly, today (June 8, 2018) you have added here again promotional textual passages. Here it concerns however a wiki, compare that calmly times with the Wikipedia. Some of it I've clarified, some passages would have to be worded more factually again. Since I would like no Edit was, now here this reference. It would be best if you could adjust the flowery passages yourself.
- " Hardly any other manufacturer in the HiFi industry can show a development like Onkyo. " Could you please justify this factually? I would delete this sentence, because in my opinion the deeper content is missing.
Or " In addition to new innovative products: what are they?
- "exclusive technical concepts:" Are the concepts mentioned really 'exclusive'? Does no competitor have anything comparable and is thus also far behind Onkyo, especially in terms of sound quality?
I would also like to question the section on contemporary history: does it really matter in which year which national company was founded? Surely that can be presented in a more compact way . . .
- History section in a nutshell: regain its reputation as a .... regain, how does that work?, or some extremely competent audio components: when is an audio component extremely competent??
- Very much hope for your understanding or info here on the discussion page. MfG--Analoghatwas (Discussion) 20:00, 8 Jun 2018 (CEST)