Difference between revisions of "Talk:Equalizer"
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
moin, wie kann ein Equalizer ein HiFi-Gerät sein ?: Das ist ja ein Ananchronismus an sich! Klirrfaktor ist nicht, da ja kein Verstärker - und Frequenzgang linear geht bei so nem Ding nicht... oder lieg ich da falsch?
+
An E !!!has nothing lost in a HiFi system!!,either it sounds or it doesn't - junk.HW
  
−
Da liegst du völlig falsch.
+
moin, how can an equalizer be a HiFi device ?: That is an ananchronism in itself! Distortion factor is not, because no amplifier - and frequency response linear does not go with such a thing ... or am I wrong?
  
−
Be Reglerstellung 0 aller Regler muß der Frequenzgang eines Equalizers linear sein.
+
You're completely wrong.
−
Und das ist er auch mit Ausnahme einiger Billigprodukte auch, und zwar sehr linear, d.h. innerhalb ±0,1-0,2 dB.
 
  
−
Und einen Klirrfaktor hat ein Equalizer auch, aber der liegt sehr sehr niedrieg und i.d.R. unter dem Niveau eines Verstärkers.
+
With all controls set to 0, the frequency response of an equalizer must be linear.
 +
And it is, with the exception of some cheap products, very linear, i.e. within ±0.1-0.2 dB.
  
−
Auch das Märchen vom Rauschgenerator Equalizer stimmt nicht.
+
And an equalizer also has a distortion factor, but this is very low and usually below the level of an amplifier.
−
Rauschabstände von über 100dB sind bei Equalizern gar nicht so selten, über 90 dB schafft eigentlich jedes Gerät.
 
  
−
Ein Equalizer hat seinen Bestimmungszweck im Ausgleichen von Frequenzgangfehlern.
+
Also the fairy tale of the noise generator equalizer is not true.
−
I.d.R. sind das vom Raum oder der Aufstellung der Lautsprecher verursachte Frequenzgangfehler.
+
Noise levels of over 100dB are not that rare with equalizers, over 90dB is actually possible with any device.
  
−
Grüsse
+
The purpose of an equalizer is to compensate frequency response errors.
 +
Usually these are frequency response errors caused by the room or the positioning of the loudspeakers.
 +
 
 +
Greetings
 
Roman
 
Roman

Latest revision as of 01:24, 9 July 2016

An E !!!has nothing lost in a HiFi system!!,either it sounds or it doesn't - junk.HW

moin, how can an equalizer be a HiFi device ?: That is an ananchronism in itself! Distortion factor is not, because no amplifier - and frequency response linear does not go with such a thing ... or am I wrong?

You're completely wrong.

With all controls set to 0, the frequency response of an equalizer must be linear. And it is, with the exception of some cheap products, very linear, i.e. within ±0.1-0.2 dB.

And an equalizer also has a distortion factor, but this is very low and usually below the level of an amplifier.

Also the fairy tale of the noise generator equalizer is not true. Noise levels of over 100dB are not that rare with equalizers, over 90dB is actually possible with any device.

The purpose of an equalizer is to compensate frequency response errors. Usually these are frequency response errors caused by the room or the positioning of the loudspeakers.

Greetings Roman

Retrieved from "https://hifi-wiki.com/index.php?title=Talk:Equalizer&oldid=105039"