Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | Better in case of wear immediately a larger engine "conjure up" - let! But: the mechanics is actually unfortunately not to help!
| + | Besser bei Verschleiss, gleich einen grösseren Motor "einzaubern" - lassen!Aber : der Mechanik ist eigendlich leider nicht zu helfen! |
− | You can see it in the gap dimension of the cassette compartment when it was NEW (Yamaha catalog)!
| + | Man sieht es am Spaltmass des Kassettenfaches als es NEU war!HW |
− | | |
− | You can do what you want, who now buys a 670 / 690 used MUST have new Peesen (belts) after 20 or 25 years!!!HW
| |
− | | |
− | Still the best sound (room, bass, channel separation - world class - e.g. better than Revox, Akai etc.)! HW
| |
− | | |
− | == calibration time ==
| |
− | | |
− | The calibration time is about half of the [[Revox B 215MkII|Revox B215 Mk II]], however, regarding the latter at least 3 years have passed. Developers will think of something . . .
| |
− | Analoghatwas
| |
− | | |
− | Still top in terms of the measuring time 10 sec!!2020.HW
| |