Difference between revisions of "Talk:What Does The Frequency Response Say?"

(Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „Hallo, stimmt, was Sie schreiben. Stimmt aber auch, dass 20 ... 20.000 Hz ungefähr das menschliche Hörvermögen beschreiben und damit auch (ein heute leicht e…“)
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Hallo,
+
Hello,
  
stimmt, was Sie schreiben.
+
what you wrote is true.
  
Stimmt aber auch, dass 20 ... 20.000 Hz ungefähr das menschliche Hörvermögen beschreiben und damit auch (ein heute leicht erreichbares) Maß für die hifi-Technik darstellen.
+
But it is also true that 20 ... 20,000 Hz roughly describe human hearing and thus also represent (an easily achievable today) measure for hifi technology.
Und auch, dass die Geradlinigkeit eines Frequenzgang etwas über Fähigkeiten einer Komponente und die Charakteristik der Auslegung verrät.
+
And also that the straightness of a frequency response reveals something about the capabilities of a component and the characteristics of the design.
Freilich braucht man dazu ein paar Kenntnisse über die dB-Skala (logarithmisch !) und wieviel davon hörbar ist.
+
Of course you need some knowledge about the dB scale (logarithmic !) and how much of it is audible.
  
Bei Lautsprechern spielt natürlich auch Raumakustik und Aufstellung eine Rolle, bei der Elektronik entfällt das allerdings.
+
With loudspeakers, room acoustics and placement of course play a role, but this is not the case with electronics.
Offenbar ist es bei der hifi-Technik aber oft hilfreich, mehr als die 20.000 Hz darzustellen, gleichgültig ob Hochtöner, Verstärker, Tonabnehmersysteme.
+
Obviously it is often helpful in hifi technology to show more than 20,000 Hz, no matter if tweeter, amplifier, pickup systems.
  
Hoffe, da kommt noch etwas - hatte mir unter Ihrer Überschrift mehr versprochen . . .
+
Hope there's something more to come - had promised myself more under your heading . . .
  
Viele Grüße Analoghatwas
+
Many greetings Analoghatwas
 +
<br />
 +
 
 +
___________________________________________<br />
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Hello,
 +
the limits of 20 Hz and 20 kHz are largely meaningless and physically unjustifiable. Roughly speaking, they result from the audibility of steady signals - which hardly ever occur, especially not in music. Therefore, they do not take into account the audible rise times, although this is where the information lies. A limit of 100 - 150 kHz would be more realistic.
 +
 
 +
Greetings...
 +
Wonneproppen

Latest revision as of 18:55, 3 February 2016

Hello,

what you wrote is true.

But it is also true that 20 ... 20,000 Hz roughly describe human hearing and thus also represent (an easily achievable today) measure for hifi technology. And also that the straightness of a frequency response reveals something about the capabilities of a component and the characteristics of the design. Of course you need some knowledge about the dB scale (logarithmic !) and how much of it is audible.

With loudspeakers, room acoustics and placement of course play a role, but this is not the case with electronics. Obviously it is often helpful in hifi technology to show more than 20,000 Hz, no matter if tweeter, amplifier, pickup systems.

Hope there's something more to come - had promised myself more under your heading . . .

Many greetings Analoghatwas

___________________________________________


Hello, the limits of 20 Hz and 20 kHz are largely meaningless and physically unjustifiable. Roughly speaking, they result from the audibility of steady signals - which hardly ever occur, especially not in music. Therefore, they do not take into account the audible rise times, although this is where the information lies. A limit of 100 - 150 kHz would be more realistic.

Greetings... Wonneproppen