Difference between revisions of "Talk:Canton Ergo 92 DC"
 
Line 1: Line 1:
−
Hallo Passat
+
Hello Passat
  
−
Danke für die Format-Korrekturen wie z.B. cm- > mm für die von mir eingetragenen Canton Ergo 72/92/102/122 DC.
+
Thanks for the format corrections such as cm- > mm for the Canton Ergo 72/92/102/122 DC I entered.
  
−
Zur Änderung betreffend des Nachfolgemodells von 609 auf 900 habe ich aber eine andere Meinung.
+
However, I have a different opinion on the change regarding the successor model from 609 to 900.
−
* die Nachfolge Info stammt direkt von der Canton Zweigstelle in Wien
+
* the successor info comes directly from the Canton branch in Vienna
−
* die Daten der 900 passen nicht zur 92, aber zur 609 -> Gewicht und Chassis sind zu 609 ident, zut 900 aber nicht.
+
the data of the 900 do not match the 92, but the 609 -> weight and chassis are identical to 609, but not to 900.
  
−
Die Hauptunterschiede sind laut Canton Zweigstelle
+
The main differences according to the Canton branch are
−
* eine überarbeitete Hochtonkalotte, welche den Frequenzbereich von 30kHz -> 40kHz nach oben erweitert hat
+
* a revised tweeter dome, extending the frequency range from 30kHz -> 40kHz upwards
−
* und in der Steigerung der Musikleistung von 300 -> 320 W
+
* and in the increase of the music power from 300 -> 320 W
  
−
Ansonsten sind 92 und 609 angeblich baugleich.
+
Otherwise, the 92 and 609 are supposedly identical in construction.
  
−
--[[Benutzer:Skydragon|Skydragon]] 22:04, 19. Dez 2007 (CET)
+
--[[User:Skydragon|Skydragon]] 22:04, 19 Dec 2007 (CET)
  
−
Da irrt die Zweigstelle.
+
That's where the branch is wrong.
  
−
Da die 92 nur bis 2001 gebaut wurde, die 609 aber erst ab 2005 gab es 4 Jahre dazwischen.
+
Since the 92 was only built until 2001, but the 609 wasn't built until 2005, there were 4 years in between.
  
  
−
Und in diesem Zeitraum gabs die x00-Generation und die x02-Generation.
+
And in this period there was the x00 generation and the x02 generation.
  
  
−
Die zeitliche Reihenfolge war also:
+
So the chronological order was:
−
* 22 DC -> 200 DC -> 202 -> 602
+
* 22 DC -> 200 DC -> 202 -> 602
−
* 32 DC -> 300 DC -> 302 -> 603
+
32 DC -> 300 DC -> 302 -> 603
−
* 72 DC -> 700 DC -> 702 DC -> 607 DC
+
* 72 DC -> 700 DC -> 702 DC -> 607 DC
−
* 92 DC -> 900 DC -> 902 DC -> 609 DC
+
* 92 DC -> 900 DC -> 902 DC -> 609 DC
−
* 102 DC -> kein modell (hätte 1000 DC heißen müssen) -> 1002 DC -> 611 DC
+
* 102 DC -> no model (should have been 1000 DC) -> 1002 DC -> 611 DC
−
* 122 DC -> 1200 DC -> keine Nachfolger (hätten 1202 DC -> 613 DC heißen müssen)
+
* 122 DC -> 1200 DC -> no successors (should have been called 1202 DC -> 613 DC)
−
* CM 52 DC -> CM 500 -> CM 502 -> 605 CM
+
* CM 52 DC -> CM 500 -> CM 502 -> 605 CM
−
* R 52 -> keine Nachfolger
+
* R 52 -> no successors
  
  
−
Zur 92 und deren Nachfolgern:
+
About the 92 and its successors:
  
  
−
==Abmessungen:==
+
==Dimensions:==
 
* 92: 23x102,5x30,7 cm
 
* 92: 23x102,5x30,7 cm
 
* 900: 23x102,5x30,7 cm
 
* 900: 23x102,5x30,7 cm
Line 49: Line 49:
 
* 609: 25/180/2x200 mm
 
* 609: 25/180/2x200 mm
  
−
==Belastbarkeit:==
+
==Power handling:==
 
* 92: 170/300 Watt
 
* 92: 170/300 Watt
 
* 900: 170/300 Watt
 
* 900: 170/300 Watt
Line 56: Line 56:
  
  
−
Wie man sieht, sind alle Lautsprecher nahezu gleich groß und haben alle die gleichen Chassisabmessungen und auch die Leistungsangaben sind annähernd identisch.
+
As you can see, all speakers are almost the same size and all have the same driver dimensions and also the power ratings are almost identical.
  
  
−
Grüsse
+
Greetings
 
Roman
 
Roman
 +
 +
 +
 +
The arguments are valid, I can't argue with them. If it's like that it will be true ;o)
 +
But wouldn't it be great to add this follow-up info to the wiki if it's already known ?
 +
 +
Greetings
 +
  Bernhard
 +
 +
--[[User:Skydragon|Skydragon]] 00:00, 20 Dec 2007 (CET)

Latest revision as of 18:00, 19 December 2007

Hello Passat

Thanks for the format corrections such as cm- > mm for the Canton Ergo 72/92/102/122 DC I entered.

However, I have a different opinion on the change regarding the successor model from 609 to 900.

  • the successor info comes directly from the Canton branch in Vienna

the data of the 900 do not match the 92, but the 609 -> weight and chassis are identical to 609, but not to 900.

The main differences according to the Canton branch are

  • a revised tweeter dome, extending the frequency range from 30kHz -> 40kHz upwards
  • and in the increase of the music power from 300 -> 320 W

Otherwise, the 92 and 609 are supposedly identical in construction.

--Skydragon 22:04, 19 Dec 2007 (CET)

That's where the branch is wrong.

Since the 92 was only built until 2001, but the 609 wasn't built until 2005, there were 4 years in between.


And in this period there was the x00 generation and the x02 generation.


So the chronological order was:

  • 22 DC -> 200 DC -> 202 -> 602

32 DC -> 300 DC -> 302 -> 603

  • 72 DC -> 700 DC -> 702 DC -> 607 DC
  • 92 DC -> 900 DC -> 902 DC -> 609 DC
  • 102 DC -> no model (should have been 1000 DC) -> 1002 DC -> 611 DC
  • 122 DC -> 1200 DC -> no successors (should have been called 1202 DC -> 613 DC)
  • CM 52 DC -> CM 500 -> CM 502 -> 605 CM
  • R 52 -> no successors


About the 92 and its successors:


Dimensions:[edit]

  • 92: 23x102,5x30,7 cm
  • 900: 23x102,5x30,7 cm
  • 902: 23x102,5x30,7 cm
  • 609: 23x105x30,5 cm

Chassis:[edit]

  • 92: 25/180/2x200 mm
  • 900: 25/180/2x200 mm
  • 902: 25/180/2x200 mm
  • 609: 25/180/2x200 mm

Power handling:[edit]

  • 92: 170/300 Watt
  • 900: 170/300 Watt
  • 902: 170/320 Watt
  • 609: 170/320 Watt


As you can see, all speakers are almost the same size and all have the same driver dimensions and also the power ratings are almost identical.


Greetings Roman


The arguments are valid, I can't argue with them. If it's like that it will be true ;o) But wouldn't it be great to add this follow-up info to the wiki if it's already known ?

Greetings 

 Bernhard

--Skydragon 00:00, 20 Dec 2007 (CET)

Retrieved from "https://hifi-wiki.com/index.php?title=Talk:Canton_Ergo_92_DC&oldid=17801"