Difference between revisions of "Talk:Myro"
Analoghatwas (talk | contribs) (Zeit des Beitrags etwas beschrieben, Hinweis auf Aussage in Test.) |
Analoghatwas (talk | contribs) (Inhalsverzeichnis entfernt.) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | __NOTOC__ | |
| + | Hello ???, | ||
| − | + | it's alright that you want to draw attention to your products, but more than a thin self-praise (=> "''We develop and manufacture loudspeakers with the claim of perfect music reproduction'') I would be interested in information about your company, the data of your products and possibly neutral test reports! | |
| − | + | many greetings | |
| − | [[ | + | [[User:Bassfreak|Bassfreak]] |
| − | == | + | == In the wiki the "we" form? == |
| − | + | Afternoon, | |
| − | + | I feel the same as Bassfreak. | |
| − | + | I particularly dislike the "self-praise form" as a company profile. | |
| − | + | It would be nice if you could adjust that yourself. And since when there is the / your company? | |
| − | + | Kind regards, Analoghatwas | |
| − | == Text | + | == Text objectified. == |
| − | + | Hello again everyone, | |
| − | + | my post above is from the WE, tonight is Tuesday.<br /> | |
| − | + | Maybe I'm too impatient, but I have the contribution times objectified. | |
| − | + | Additions from the manufacturer itself, eg year of foundation - is 1990 from test Myro Whisky at Hifi Stars? | |
| − | + | Best regards, Analoghatwas | |
| + | |||
| + | == And if you have not died...== | ||
| + | Every company wants to portray their product as the only one, but passive crossovers are really good these days thanks to simulation. Provided the engineer can do it. Passive turnouts eat up 1/3 of the power. Really cool was the big Revox Scala, DigitalAmps and Qes Qms elimination. Then nailed the Qts themselves. And that 20 years ago soon I think. I would have the circuits in the drawer. ;) | ||
| + | The biggest problem is the room, as always - acoustic, and there you can find a suitable box, or help yourself with a cheap equalizer (I just heard about cheap Behringer DEQ2496). Then the boxes no longer play so ne role. peacok | ||
| + | |||
| + | == 9/23/15 nice additions :-) == | ||
| + | |||
| + | the unpleasant "we-own-praise" is still omitted, that's something :-).<br /> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Perhaps one should still point to the studio equipment competence of the company. But that is perhaps best done by a Myroler. | ||
| + | |||
| + | @peacok: Yes, every company wants to present itself well, but I still think that this goes a bit far in a wiki. <br /> | ||
| + | Especially though, thanks for your interesting comments. | ||
| + | |||
| + | MfG, Analoghatwas | ||
Latest revision as of 14:35, 23 September 2015
Hello ???,
it's alright that you want to draw attention to your products, but more than a thin self-praise (=> "We develop and manufacture loudspeakers with the claim of perfect music reproduction) I would be interested in information about your company, the data of your products and possibly neutral test reports!
many greetings Bassfreak
In the wiki the "we" form?[edit]
Afternoon,
I feel the same as Bassfreak. I particularly dislike the "self-praise form" as a company profile. It would be nice if you could adjust that yourself. And since when there is the / your company?
Kind regards, Analoghatwas
Text objectified.[edit]
Hello again everyone,
my post above is from the WE, tonight is Tuesday.
Maybe I'm too impatient, but I have the contribution times objectified.
Additions from the manufacturer itself, eg year of foundation - is 1990 from test Myro Whisky at Hifi Stars?
Best regards, Analoghatwas
And if you have not died...[edit]
Every company wants to portray their product as the only one, but passive crossovers are really good these days thanks to simulation. Provided the engineer can do it. Passive turnouts eat up 1/3 of the power. Really cool was the big Revox Scala, DigitalAmps and Qes Qms elimination. Then nailed the Qts themselves. And that 20 years ago soon I think. I would have the circuits in the drawer. ;) The biggest problem is the room, as always - acoustic, and there you can find a suitable box, or help yourself with a cheap equalizer (I just heard about cheap Behringer DEQ2496). Then the boxes no longer play so ne role. peacok
9/23/15 nice additions :-)[edit]
the unpleasant "we-own-praise" is still omitted, that's something :-).
Perhaps one should still point to the studio equipment competence of the company. But that is perhaps best done by a Myroler.
@peacok: Yes, every company wants to present itself well, but I still think that this goes a bit far in a wiki.
Especially though, thanks for your interesting comments.
MfG, Analoghatwas