Difference between revisions of "Bang & Olufsen MMC-1"

(Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „__NOTOC__ == Daten == {{Navigation}} '''Allgemein:''' * Hersteller: Bang & Olufsen * Modell: MMC-1 * Typ: MC-Tonabnehmer * Baujahre: 1982 - 1984 * Neupreis…“)
 
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
== Daten ==
+
== Data ==
{{Navigation}}
+
{{navigation}}
'''Allgemein:'''
+
'''General:'''
* Hersteller: [[Bang & Olufsen]]
+
* Manufacturer: [[Bang & Olufsen]]
* Modell: MMC-1
+
* Model: MMC-1
* Typ: MC-Tonabnehmer
+
* Type: MC cartridge
* Baujahre: 1982 - 1984
+
* Years of manufacture: 1982 - 1996
* Neupreis ca.: 598 DM
+
* New price approx.: 598 DM
  
  
'''Technische Daten:'''
+
'''Technical data from test report'''
 +
* MM pickup
 +
** Frequency range 20 Hz to 20 kHz, ± 1dB
 +
* Pickup needle: square cross-section 0.1 x 0.1 mm, crystal-oriented rod, contact-line grind
 +
* Measured values [for comparison: manufacturer's data]
 +
* Depth scanning capability: 10 mN: 80 um; just under 12.5 mN: 90 um
 +
* Height-sensing capability: 10 mN: 0.45/0.84
 +
* Frequency intermodulation: 10 mN: 0.30/0.46%
 +
* Vertical tracking angle 19° [-°].
 +
* Transfer factor and source impedance
 +
** 0.8 mV-s/cm £ -47 dBV [> 0.6 mV-s/cm]
 +
** 650 Q + -H [-Q + -H]
 +
* Channel balance: 0.3dB[<1 dB]
 +
* Crosstalk attenuation: 30/32 dB [> 30 dB]
 +
* Pickup mass: 1.6 g [1.6 g]
 +
* Needle compliance (vertical): approx. 10 Hz: 29 um/mN
 +
* Recommended effective tonearm mass (for vertical resonance 14 to 10 Hz): up to 5 g = maximum light
 +
* Recommended termination values: CLast:250pF;RLast:47kQ
  
[[Datei:Denon Tonabnehmer-Daten.jpg]]
 
  
 +
* More data at "Beoworld": [https://www.beoworld.org/prod_details.asp?pid=731]
  
== Bemerkungen ==
 
* Weitere Modelle der gleichen Serie:
 
  
 +
== Comments ==
 +
* Other models in the same series:
 +
* [[Bang & Olufsen MMC-1]]
 +
* [[Bang & Olufsen MMC-2]]
 +
* [[Bang & Olufsen MMC-3]]
 +
* [[Bang & Olufsen MMC-4]]
 +
* [[Bang & Olufsen MMC-5]]
  
== Bilder ==
 
  
 +
== Pictures ==
 +
* Picture: Bang & Olufsen MMC-1
 +
[[File:Bang & Olufsen MMC-1-Prospekt-1984.jpg]]
  
== Berichte ==
 
* Bericht dazu von "Hifi-Museum":
 
* Denon DL-305:
 
* Das DL-305 ist eine verbesserte Ausführung des bisherigen Spitzenmodells DL-303. Sie wurde erreicht durch eine Gewichtsverminderung des Nadelträgers und die Erhöhung seiner Steifigkeit. Als Nadelträger wird jetzt ein dünnwandiges Röhrchen aus amorphem Bor verwendet. Hinten auf dem Nadelträger sitzt wie beim MMC-l ein kreuzförmiger Anker, auf den aber, da es sich um ein MC-System handelt, die Spulen aufgewickelt sind (Bild unten).
 
  
Im Luftspalt befindet sich ein starker Samarium-Kobalt-Magnet. Als Abtastnadel wird ein kristallorientiertes Stäbchen mit einem Querschnitt von 0,05 x 0,1mm und speziellem elliptischem Schliff verwendet. Der Ladenpreis dieses knapp 6g schweren MC-Tonabnehmers dürfte bei rund 1000,- DM liegen.
+
* Picture: Bang & Olufsen MMC-1
 +
[[File:Bang & Olufsen MMC-1-1982.jpg]]
  
* Weitere Infos: [[http://www.hifimuseum.de/6-edel-abtaster-1982-83.html]]
+
 
 +
== Reports ==
 +
* Report on this from "Hifi Museum":
 +
* Bang & Olufsen MMC-1:
 +
* Very good low end sampling capability, satisfactory high end sampling capability. Very good FIM behaviour. Relatively small transfer factor. Excellent crosstalk attenuation. Slight treble drop in frequency response. No treble resonance detectable in the transmission range. Music listening test: Slightly less exposed overtone range in pink noise. Mozart: slightly softer drawing in the high violin registers. Piano: clean pickup, slightly less impulse harshness in the treble, less contour sharpness in the bass. Shure TTR 115: 5th level clean. Shure TTR 117:5. level unclean. Overall verdict: Top class MM cartridge, suitable for very light tonearms. Price-quality ratio: not particularly favourable.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
* More info at "Hifi-Museum": [http://www.hifimuseum.de/6-edel-abtaster-1982-83.html]
  
  
Line 35: Line 63:
  
  
[[Kategorie:Tonabnehmer]]
+
[[Category:Pickups]]

Latest revision as of 01:29, 20 September 2020

Data[edit]

General:

  • Manufacturer: Bang & Olufsen
  • Model: MMC-1
  • Type: MC cartridge
  • Years of manufacture: 1982 - 1996
  • New price approx.: 598 DM


Technical data from test report

  • MM pickup
    • Frequency range 20 Hz to 20 kHz, ± 1dB
  • Pickup needle: square cross-section 0.1 x 0.1 mm, crystal-oriented rod, contact-line grind
  • Measured values [for comparison: manufacturer's data]
  • Depth scanning capability: 10 mN: 80 um; just under 12.5 mN: 90 um
  • Height-sensing capability: 10 mN: 0.45/0.84
  • Frequency intermodulation: 10 mN: 0.30/0.46%
  • Vertical tracking angle 19° [-°].
  • Transfer factor and source impedance
    • 0.8 mV-s/cm £ -47 dBV [> 0.6 mV-s/cm]
    • 650 Q + -H [-Q + -H]
  • Channel balance: 0.3dB[<1 dB]
  • Crosstalk attenuation: 30/32 dB [> 30 dB]
  • Pickup mass: 1.6 g [1.6 g]
  • Needle compliance (vertical): approx. 10 Hz: 29 um/mN
  • Recommended effective tonearm mass (for vertical resonance 14 to 10 Hz): up to 5 g = maximum light
  • Recommended termination values: CLast:250pF;RLast:47kQ


  • More data at "Beoworld": [1]


Comments[edit]


Pictures[edit]

  • Picture: Bang & Olufsen MMC-1

Bang & Olufsen MMC-1-Prospekt-1984.jpg


  • Picture: Bang & Olufsen MMC-1

Bang & Olufsen MMC-1-1982.jpg


Reports[edit]

  • Report on this from "Hifi Museum":
  • Bang & Olufsen MMC-1:
  • Very good low end sampling capability, satisfactory high end sampling capability. Very good FIM behaviour. Relatively small transfer factor. Excellent crosstalk attenuation. Slight treble drop in frequency response. No treble resonance detectable in the transmission range. Music listening test: Slightly less exposed overtone range in pink noise. Mozart: slightly softer drawing in the high violin registers. Piano: clean pickup, slightly less impulse harshness in the treble, less contour sharpness in the bass. Shure TTR 115: 5th level clean. Shure TTR 117:5. level unclean. Overall verdict: Top class MM cartridge, suitable for very light tonearms. Price-quality ratio: not particularly favourable.


  • More info at "Hifi-Museum": [2]


Links[edit]