Difference between revisions of "Talk:Canton Ergo 92 DC"
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | Hello Passat | |
| − | + | Thanks for the format corrections such as cm- > mm for the Canton Ergo 72/92/102/122 DC I entered. | |
| − | + | However, I have a different opinion on the change regarding the successor model from 609 to 900. | |
| − | * | + | * the successor info comes directly from the Canton branch in Vienna |
| − | + | the data of the 900 do not match the 92, but the 609 -> weight and chassis are identical to 609, but not to 900. | |
| − | + | The main differences according to the Canton branch are | |
| − | * | + | * a revised tweeter dome, extending the frequency range from 30kHz -> 40kHz upwards |
| − | * | + | * and in the increase of the music power from 300 -> 320 W |
| − | + | Otherwise, the 92 and 609 are supposedly identical in construction. | |
| − | --[[ | + | --[[User:Skydragon|Skydragon]] 22:04, 19 Dec 2007 (CET) |
| − | + | That's where the branch is wrong. | |
| − | + | Since the 92 was only built until 2001, but the 609 wasn't built until 2005, there were 4 years in between. | |
| − | |||
| − | + | And in this period there was the x00 generation and the x02 generation. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | So the chronological order was: | |
| − | 92 | + | * 22 DC -> 200 DC -> 202 -> 602 |
| − | + | 32 DC -> 300 DC -> 302 -> 603 | |
| − | + | * 72 DC -> 700 DC -> 702 DC -> 607 DC | |
| − | + | * 92 DC -> 900 DC -> 902 DC -> 609 DC | |
| + | * 102 DC -> no model (should have been 1000 DC) -> 1002 DC -> 611 DC | ||
| + | * 122 DC -> 1200 DC -> no successors (should have been called 1202 DC -> 613 DC) | ||
| + | * CM 52 DC -> CM 500 -> CM 502 -> 605 CM | ||
| + | * R 52 -> no successors | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | About the 92 and its successors: | |
| − | + | ||
| + | ==Dimensions:== | ||
| + | * 92: 23x102,5x30,7 cm | ||
| + | * 900: 23x102,5x30,7 cm | ||
| + | * 902: 23x102,5x30,7 cm | ||
| + | * 609: 23x105x30,5 cm | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Chassis:== | ||
| + | * 92: 25/180/2x200 mm | ||
| + | * 900: 25/180/2x200 mm | ||
| + | * 902: 25/180/2x200 mm | ||
| + | * 609: 25/180/2x200 mm | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Power handling:== | ||
| + | * 92: 170/300 Watt | ||
| + | * 900: 170/300 Watt | ||
| + | * 902: 170/320 Watt | ||
| + | * 609: 170/320 Watt | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | As you can see, all speakers are almost the same size and all have the same driver dimensions and also the power ratings are almost identical. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Greetings | ||
Roman | Roman | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | The arguments are valid, I can't argue with them. If it's like that it will be true ;o) | ||
| + | But wouldn't it be great to add this follow-up info to the wiki if it's already known ? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Greetings | ||
| + | Bernhard | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Skydragon|Skydragon]] 00:00, 20 Dec 2007 (CET) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:00, 19 December 2007
Hello Passat
Thanks for the format corrections such as cm- > mm for the Canton Ergo 72/92/102/122 DC I entered.
However, I have a different opinion on the change regarding the successor model from 609 to 900.
- the successor info comes directly from the Canton branch in Vienna
the data of the 900 do not match the 92, but the 609 -> weight and chassis are identical to 609, but not to 900.
The main differences according to the Canton branch are
- a revised tweeter dome, extending the frequency range from 30kHz -> 40kHz upwards
- and in the increase of the music power from 300 -> 320 W
Otherwise, the 92 and 609 are supposedly identical in construction.
--Skydragon 22:04, 19 Dec 2007 (CET)
That's where the branch is wrong.
Since the 92 was only built until 2001, but the 609 wasn't built until 2005, there were 4 years in between.
And in this period there was the x00 generation and the x02 generation.
So the chronological order was:
- 22 DC -> 200 DC -> 202 -> 602
32 DC -> 300 DC -> 302 -> 603
- 72 DC -> 700 DC -> 702 DC -> 607 DC
- 92 DC -> 900 DC -> 902 DC -> 609 DC
- 102 DC -> no model (should have been 1000 DC) -> 1002 DC -> 611 DC
- 122 DC -> 1200 DC -> no successors (should have been called 1202 DC -> 613 DC)
- CM 52 DC -> CM 500 -> CM 502 -> 605 CM
- R 52 -> no successors
About the 92 and its successors:
Dimensions:[edit]
- 92: 23x102,5x30,7 cm
- 900: 23x102,5x30,7 cm
- 902: 23x102,5x30,7 cm
- 609: 23x105x30,5 cm
Chassis:[edit]
- 92: 25/180/2x200 mm
- 900: 25/180/2x200 mm
- 902: 25/180/2x200 mm
- 609: 25/180/2x200 mm
Power handling:[edit]
- 92: 170/300 Watt
- 900: 170/300 Watt
- 902: 170/320 Watt
- 609: 170/320 Watt
As you can see, all speakers are almost the same size and all have the same driver dimensions and also the power ratings are almost identical.
Greetings
Roman
The arguments are valid, I can't argue with them. If it's like that it will be true ;o) But wouldn't it be great to add this follow-up info to the wiki if it's already known ?
Greetings
Bernhard
--Skydragon 00:00, 20 Dec 2007 (CET)