Difference between revisions of "KEF Q 500"
Stefan Phan (talk | contribs) |
(→Pictures) |
||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
== Pictures == | == Pictures == | ||
| + | [[Image:Kef q500 s.jpg]] | ||
| + | [[Image:Kef q500 f2.jpg]] | ||
| + | [[Image:Kef q500 b.jpg]] | ||
| + | [[Image:Kef q500 c.jpg]] | ||
| + | |||
[[Image:KEF Q 500.jpg]] | [[Image:KEF Q 500.jpg]] | ||
| + | |||
== Reviews == | == Reviews == | ||
* PC Welt Issue 4/2011 Plus; Rank 9/10 in the test: "satisfactory" (2.89) Price / performance: "good value". | * PC Welt Issue 4/2011 Plus; Rank 9/10 in the test: "satisfactory" (2.89) Price / performance: "good value". | ||
Revision as of 02:44, 28 November 2025
Data
General
- Manufacturer: KEF
- Model: Q500
- Years of manufacture: 2010 -
- Manufactured in:
- Color: Black Oak, Cherry, Walnut (all foil).
- Dimensions: 870 x 180 x 272 mm (HxWxD)
- Weight: 15 kg
- New price approx.: 499 €/piece
Technical Data
- Type: 2 1/2-way bass reflex, floorstanding speaker
- Chassis:
- woofer: 1x 130 mm (aluminum Uni-Q)
Midrange driver: 1x 130 mm (aluminum Uni-Q)
- Tweeter: 1x 25 mm (aluminium dome); tweeter and midrange combined in one chassis
Passive cone: 2x 130 mm (aluminium)
- Power handling: 15 - 130 Watt (recommended)
efficiency: 87 dB (2,83V/1m)
- Frequency response: 40 - 40,000 Hz
- Crossover frequency: 2.500 Hz
- Impedance: 8 Ohm
Special Features
Remarks
Successor of the iQx0 series
Other models in the same series:
Predecessor model:
Pictures
Reviews
- PC Welt Issue 4/2011 Plus; Rank 9/10 in the test: "satisfactory" (2.89) Price / performance: "good value".
- "Plus: Very clean, neutral and spatial reproduction; Good omnidirectional sound.
- Minus: Bass imprecise; Speaker terminals not CE/IEC compliant."
- stereoplay issue 1/2011; 7 products tested: "good" (68 points) Price/performance: "very good".
- "The Q 500 is the smallest column in the series and completely trimmed to delicate dimensions. It contains the small coax, flanked by a bass driver and two passive diaphragms. Fine and resolved sound like the Q 100, with a fuller substructure."
- audio issue 12/2010; 3rd/3rd place in test: sound rating: 80 points price/performance: "outstanding", "buy tip price/performance".
Plus: incredibly fine playing and sensationally natural imaging.
- Minus: At high levels a little little kick and authority."




