Difference between revisions of "Rotel RSX-1055"

 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
== Daten ==
+
== Data ==
{{Navigation}}
+
{{navigation}}
'''Allgemein'''
+
'''General'''
* Hersteller: [[Rotel]]
+
* Manufacturer: [[Rotel]]
* Modell: RSX-1055
+
* Model: RSX-1055
* Typ: A/V-Receiver
+
* Type: A/V receiver
* Baujahre: 2002 - 2003
+
* Years of manufacture: 2002 - 2003
* Farbe: Silber / Schwarz
+
* Color: Silver / Black
* Fernbedienung: ja
+
* Remote control: yes
* Neupreis ca.: 1'500 Euro
+
* Original price approx.: 1'999 Euro
  
  
'''Technische Daten'''
+
'''Technical data'''
  
[[Datei:Rotel RSX-1055-Prospekt-2.jpg]]
+
[[File:Rotel RSX-1055-Prospekt-2.jpg]]
  
  
== Bemerkungen ==
+
== Remarks ==
* Weitere Modelle der gleichen Serie:
+
* Other models in the same series:
 
* [[Rotel RSX-03]]
 
* [[Rotel RSX-03]]
 
* [[Rotel RSX-965 RDS]]
 
* [[Rotel RSX-965 RDS]]
Line 30: Line 30:
  
  
== Bilder ==
+
== Pictures ==
* Auszug aus Prospekt: Rotel RSX-1055
+
* Extract from brochure: Rotel RSX-1055
[[Datei:Rotel RSX-1055-Prospekt-1.jpg]]
+
[[File:Rotel RSX-1055-Prospekt-1.jpg]]
  
  
== Berichte ==
+
== Reports ==
* Heimkino Ausgabe 12/2003; Platz 2/12 im Test: 1,1; Spitzenklasse
+
* Report in "FonoForum" 1 / 2003
** „Plus: wertiges Design; exzellenter Klang. Minus: grob gerasterte Verzögerungszeiten.
+
 
 +
* Home cinema issue 12/2003; 2nd/12th place in test: 1.1; top class
 +
** "Plus: valuable design; excellent sound. Minus: coarsely gridded delay times."
  
  
Line 43: Line 45:
  
  
[[Kategorie:A/V-Receiver]]
+
[[Category:A/V Receivers]]

Latest revision as of 10:04, 27 March 2020

Data[edit]

General

  • Manufacturer: Rotel
  • Model: RSX-1055
  • Type: A/V receiver
  • Years of manufacture: 2002 - 2003
  • Color: Silver / Black
  • Remote control: yes
  • Original price approx.: 1'999 Euro


Technical data

Rotel RSX-1055-Prospekt-2.jpg


Remarks[edit]


Pictures[edit]

  • Extract from brochure: Rotel RSX-1055

Rotel RSX-1055-Prospekt-1.jpg


Reports[edit]

  • Report in "FonoForum" 1 / 2003
  • Home cinema issue 12/2003; 2nd/12th place in test: 1.1; top class
    • "Plus: valuable design; excellent sound. Minus: coarsely gridded delay times."


Links[edit]