Difference between revisions of "Talk:Revox B 215MkII"

("Liebeslied" war vermutlich Werbetext)
(Aw.)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Um dem Liebeslied ein bisschen in die Parade zu fahren: Ich habe das Revox-Deck mit einem "gewöhnlichen" [[Yamaha KX-670 |Yamaha 670]] getestet: Das Yamaha klang bedeutend frischer, Kanaltrennung, Spur, Frequenzgang, - auch mit Fremdkassetten -, um nicht von Welten zu sprechen (man muss kein Profi sein, um das zu hören). Natürlich bleiben dem Yamaha die Gleichlaufprobleme. <br />
+
To give Love Song a bit of a run for its money: I tested the Revox deck with an "ordinary" [[Yamaha KX-670 |Yamaha 670]]: The Yamaha sounded significantly fresher, channel separation, track, frequency response, - even with foreign cassettes - not to speak of worlds (you don't have to be a pro to hear that). Of course, the Yamaha remains the synchronization problems. <br />
Auch bleiben beim Revox bei längerer Pause die Motoren stehen (kleben!?), mehrmaliger Fullautostop!  HW
+
Also, with the Revox, the motors stop (stick!?) when paused for a long time, multiple fullautostop!  HW
  
== "Liebeslied" war vermutlich Werbetext ==
+
== "Love song" was probably advertising text ==
  
hoffe bzgl. dem obigen informativen Diskussionsbeitrag, es ist auch entschlackt noch zu erkennen (03.06.2016).<br />
+
hope bzgl. the above informative discussion post, it is also purged still to recognize (03.06.2016).<br />
Die Gleichlaufprobleme des Yamaha, was jedoch durch Preis und damit auch dem entsprechenden Laufwerk eine andere Liga ist, sind natürlich ein Punkt!<br />
+
The synchronization problems of the Yamaha, which is, however, by price and thus also the corresponding drive another league, are of course a point!<br />
 
MfG, Analoghatwas
 
MfG, Analoghatwas
  
  
HW: KEIN Werbetext - sondern MEIN Text.Ich beschäftige mich mit HiFI seit 1976 - im Ilmenauer Hochschulfunk.Damals noch mit Sander & Janzen - 76--Mono!!HW
+
HW: NOT an advertising text - but MY text. I have been involved with HiFI since 1976 - in Ilmenau university radio. At that time still with Sander &amp; Janzen - 76--Mono!!! HW
 +
Jo, your text :-), advertising text referred to the "love song".
 +
: Ps: The info about you anyway interssant :-), mfG --[[User:Analoghatwas|Analoghatwas]] ([[User Discussion:Analoghatwas|Discussion]]) 10:36, 1 Jun 2018 (CEST)

Latest revision as of 03:36, 1 June 2018

To give Love Song a bit of a run for its money: I tested the Revox deck with an "ordinary" Yamaha 670: The Yamaha sounded significantly fresher, channel separation, track, frequency response, - even with foreign cassettes - not to speak of worlds (you don't have to be a pro to hear that). Of course, the Yamaha remains the synchronization problems.
Also, with the Revox, the motors stop (stick!?) when paused for a long time, multiple fullautostop! HW

"Love song" was probably advertising text[edit]

hope bzgl. the above informative discussion post, it is also purged still to recognize (03.06.2016).
The synchronization problems of the Yamaha, which is, however, by price and thus also the corresponding drive another league, are of course a point!
MfG, Analoghatwas


HW: NOT an advertising text - but MY text. I have been involved with HiFI since 1976 - in Ilmenau university radio. At that time still with Sander & Janzen - 76--Mono!!! HW Jo, your text :-), advertising text referred to the "love song".

Ps: The info about you anyway interssant :-), mfG --Analoghatwas (Discussion) 10:36, 1 Jun 2018 (CEST)