Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | Hello Passat
| + | Hallo Passat |
| | | |
− | Thanks for the format corrections such as cm- > mm for the Canton Ergo 72/92/102/122 DC I entered.
| + | Danke für die Format-Korrekturen wie z.B. cm- > mm für die von mir eingetragenen Canton Ergo 72/92/102/122 DC. |
| | | |
− | However, I have a different opinion on the change regarding the successor model from 609 to 900.
| + | Zur Änderung betreffend des Nachfolgemodells von 609 auf 900 habe ich aber eine andere Meinung. |
− | * the successor info comes directly from the Canton branch in Vienna | + | * die Nachfolge Info stammt direkt von der Canton Zweigstelle in Wien |
− | the data of the 900 do not match the 92, but the 609 -> weight and chassis are identical to 609, but not to 900.
| + | * die Daten der 900 passen nicht zur 92, aber zur 609 -> Gewicht und Chassis sind zu 609 ident, zut 900 aber nicht. |
| | | |
− | The main differences according to the Canton branch are
| + | Die Hauptunterschiede sind laut Canton Zweigstelle |
− | * a revised tweeter dome, extending the frequency range from 30kHz -> 40kHz upwards | + | * eine überarbeitete Hochtonkalotte, welche den Frequenzbereich von 30kHz -> 40kHz nach oben erweitert hat |
− | * and in the increase of the music power from 300 -> 320 W | + | * und in der Steigerung der Musikleistung von 300 -> 320 W |
| | | |
− | Otherwise, the 92 and 609 are supposedly identical in construction.
| + | Ansonsten sind 92 und 609 angeblich baugleich. |
| | | |
− | --[[User:Skydragon|Skydragon]] 22:04, 19 Dec 2007 (CET) | + | --[[Benutzer:Skydragon|Skydragon]] 22:04, 19. Dez 2007 (CET) |
− | | |
− | That's where the branch is wrong.
| |
− | | |
− | Since the 92 was only built until 2001, but the 609 wasn't built until 2005, there were 4 years in between.
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | And in this period there was the x00 generation and the x02 generation.
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | So the chronological order was:
| |
− | * 22 DC -> 200 DC -> 202 -> 602
| |
− | 32 DC -> 300 DC -> 302 -> 603
| |
− | * 72 DC -> 700 DC -> 702 DC -> 607 DC
| |
− | * 92 DC -> 900 DC -> 902 DC -> 609 DC
| |
− | * 102 DC -> no model (should have been 1000 DC) -> 1002 DC -> 611 DC
| |
− | * 122 DC -> 1200 DC -> no successors (should have been called 1202 DC -> 613 DC)
| |
− | * CM 52 DC -> CM 500 -> CM 502 -> 605 CM
| |
− | * R 52 -> no successors
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | About the 92 and its successors:
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | ==Dimensions:==
| |
− | * 92: 23x102,5x30,7 cm
| |
− | * 900: 23x102,5x30,7 cm
| |
− | * 902: 23x102,5x30,7 cm
| |
− | * 609: 23x105x30,5 cm
| |
− | | |
− | ==Chassis:==
| |
− | * 92: 25/180/2x200 mm
| |
− | * 900: 25/180/2x200 mm
| |
− | * 902: 25/180/2x200 mm
| |
− | * 609: 25/180/2x200 mm
| |
− | | |
− | ==Power handling:==
| |
− | * 92: 170/300 Watt
| |
− | * 900: 170/300 Watt
| |
− | * 902: 170/320 Watt
| |
− | * 609: 170/320 Watt
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | As you can see, all speakers are almost the same size and all have the same driver dimensions and also the power ratings are almost identical.
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | Greetings
| |
− | Roman
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | | |
− | The arguments are valid, I can't argue with them. If it's like that it will be true ;o)
| |
− | But wouldn't it be great to add this follow-up info to the wiki if it's already known ?
| |
− | | |
− | Greetings
| |
− | Bernhard
| |
− | | |
− | --[[User:Skydragon|Skydragon]] 00:00, 20 Dec 2007 (CET)
| |